🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, nations are investing hundreds of billions into what is known as “sovereign AI” – creating their own AI systems. Starting with the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are competing to create AI that grasps native tongues and local customs.

The Global AI Arms Race

This initiative is an element in a broader worldwide contest led by tech giants from the America and China. While organizations like OpenAI and a social media giant allocate massive resources, middle powers are also placing independent investments in the artificial intelligence domain.

But amid such tremendous amounts in play, is it possible for developing countries attain notable gains? According to an expert from a prominent policy organization, Except if you’re a rich government or a major firm, it’s a significant burden to create an LLM from scratch.”

Security Concerns

Numerous countries are unwilling to use overseas AI models. Across India, for example, American-made AI tools have at times proven inadequate. A particular case involved an AI tool used to instruct learners in a remote community – it interacted in English with a thick US accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional students.

Additionally there’s the defence dimension. In the Indian military authorities, using certain foreign AI tools is considered not permissible. Per an developer noted, “It could have some arbitrary learning material that may state that, oh, Ladakh is not part of India … Utilizing that specific system in a military context is a major risk.”

He continued, I’ve discussed with individuals who are in security. They aim to use AI, but, forget about particular tools, they prefer not to rely on American platforms because details could travel outside the country, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

National Efforts

As a result, a number of countries are funding local projects. An example such a effort is underway in India, wherein an organization is working to create a domestic LLM with government funding. This project has committed approximately $1.25bn to AI development.

The founder foresees a model that is less resource-intensive than leading tools from US and Chinese firms. He explains that the nation will have to make up for the funding gap with expertise. Based in India, we lack the option of pouring huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we contend against such as the enormous investments that the America is investing? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the strategic thinking is essential.”

Local Priority

In Singapore, a public project is backing language models educated in south-east Asia’s native tongues. Such tongues – including Malay, the Thai language, the Lao language, Indonesian, Khmer and more – are often poorly represented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I wish the individuals who are building these sovereign AI models were aware of the extent to which and how quickly the cutting edge is advancing.

A leader participating in the program notes that these tools are created to enhance bigger AI, instead of replacing them. Platforms such as ChatGPT and Gemini, he comments, frequently have difficulty with regional languages and local customs – speaking in unnatural the Khmer language, for instance, or recommending pork-based meals to Malay consumers.

Creating local-language LLMs enables local governments to include cultural sensitivity – and at least be “smart consumers” of a sophisticated tool built in other countries.

He further explains, “I’m very careful with the word sovereign. I think what we’re trying to say is we aim to be more accurately reflected and we aim to comprehend the capabilities” of AI systems.

International Cooperation

Regarding states seeking to carve out a role in an growing global market, there’s a different approach: join forces. Researchers connected to a prominent university have suggested a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a alliance of middle-income countries.

They call the initiative “Airbus for AI”, modeled after Europe’s productive strategy to develop a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. The plan would involve the establishment of a public AI company that would combine the capabilities of several states’ AI programs – such as the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Sweden – to create a competitive rival to the American and Asian leaders.

The lead author of a paper setting out the initiative notes that the idea has gained the interest of AI ministers of at least three states to date, as well as several state AI companies. Although it is currently targeting “developing countries”, emerging economies – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have likewise indicated willingness.

He elaborates, “Nowadays, I think it’s just a fact there’s diminished faith in the assurances of the present American government. Individuals are wondering for example, is it safe to rely on such systems? Suppose they decide to