🔗 Share this article

When Vladimir Putin traveled to the South Asian nation in the previous decade, the global landscape looked entirely distinct. That short trip, limited by the global health crisis, focused on discussions on strategic and defense cooperation between the two leaders.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of Ukraine would transform the Russian leader into a global pariah, significantly restricting his overseas engagements.

Additionally, that period came before a major change in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by contentious rhetoric and the introduction of heavy import duties.

"In this context, the significance of this diplomatic mission to engage with the Indian PM cannot be overstated, serving as a symbol of resilient relations and a defiance of external pressure," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Two Major Powers

The high-level meeting takes place at a crucial time. The Kremlin leader arrives after dismissing recent peace proposals for Ukraine, confident due to reported gains by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this visit is its simple happening," commented a senior researcher based in Moscow. "It suggests a return to something resembling normal international relations."

From Delhi's standpoint, the risks are particularly elevated. The country faces a challenging geopolitical climate, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a diminished Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

This delicate balance was highlighted just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats published a joint opinion piece questioning Russia's commitment to peace. This elicited a firm rebuke from Indian officials, who labeled it an inappropriate diplomatic practice.

'China Remains the Greatest Threat'

The India-Russia bond originates from the Soviet period and remains firmly rooted, with Moscow historically being Delhi's primary arms provider. This relationship was generally accepted by the West until a recent shift.

For years, Western nations overlooked India's large-scale buying of cheap energy from Russia. Yet, in the wake of failed peace efforts, accusations increased, leading to economic penalties and a significant downturn in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"Consequently, India has returned to its traditional posture of maintaining multiple options," noted a foreign policy expert. "It signals to the US that it has alternatives and is observing how the global dynamics settle."

Apart from international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is its strategic location. "China remains the greatest threat to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst stated.

The deepening Moscow-Beijing axis has raised alarms in Delhi, prompting efforts to avoid an unbreakable bond between its adversary and its longtime partner.

This concern has also spurred India's drive to reduce its defense procurement, decreasing its dependence on Russian equipment from about 70% to under 40% in the past few years.

"Delhi will try to find a middle ground: purchase enough Russian weaponry to keep the partnership alive, but not become so dependent that a sudden cutoff would leave it vulnerable," the analyst concluded.

Energy and Economic Ties

Enhanced economic cooperation is expected to be a major topic. The Russian leader has recently stressed plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", in spite of Western sanctions.

The matter of energy purchases is central. Although the Indian government has stated to continue buying Russian oil, new sanctions have dampened activity from the commercial buyers. At the same time, India has agreed to boost imports of American oil and gas.

A Kremlin spokesperson acknowledged "obstacles" in economic cooperation but said it would continue without major disruption. The official downplayed the effect of sanctions, stating they would cause only "minor" and "temporary" drops and that Russia possesses the "technology" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is likely to be mentioned primarily through India's consistent appeal for dialogue and peace.

"While the Indian leader has access to all parties, India lacks the diplomatic clout to alter the course of the war," the analyst said. "Aside from encouraging talks, its capacity to effect change is constrained."

In the end, despite the visible friendship between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pure realpolitik," guided by cold calculation in a rapidly changing world.